Skip to main content

FOREST RIGHTS ACT: AN OVERVIEW- BY J.IRFANA FATHIMA

INTRODUCTION
The Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dweller (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, is the key piece of forest legislation passed on 18th December, 2006. It has also been called the Forest Rights Act, the Tribal Rights Act, the Tribal Bill, and the Tribal Land Act. The act basically does two things: Grants legal recognition to the rights of traditional forest dwelling communities, partially correcting the injustice caused by the forest laws and makes a beginning towards giving communities and the public a voice in forest and wildlife conservation.
SALIENT FEATURES OF THE FOREST RIGHTS ACT
Following are the salient features of FRA for proper understanding of the act.
a.   The act is in fact a means to recognise the rights of these tribals and gives rights to forests dwellers scheduled tribes and related forest dwellers. These rights have been recognised in sec.3 of the act that includes right to forest land in terms of living, holding, occupying the forest land. 
b.  The FRA is basically of a right vesting nature and provides for consolidation and recognition of pre existing rights which meant that the rights were already in existence even before the FRA was formulated. 
c.  The act also talks about the rights and duties that the forest dwellers hold in terms of protecting the wild life and diversity of the forests and other ecological areas to promote sustainability in these areas. Chapter IV covers these areas and generally covers the procedures for enforcement of these rights. One of the most important areas is the authority of the Gram Sabha. This is an important aspect related to decentralisation of power.
DEFINITIONS
Section 2 of this Act provides definition of various terms relating to forest. In T. N. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs Union of India, The Supreme Court of India defined forests as all areas that are forests in the dictionary meaning of the term irrespective of the nature of ownership and classification thereof shall be under the control of the forest department. In VEDANTA CASE - Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd vs Ministry of Environment & Forest & others, The court held that Scheduled Tribe, as such, is not defined in the Forest Rights Act, but the word “Traditional Forest Dweller” has been defined under section 2(o) as any member community who has for at least three generations prior to the 13th day of December, 2005 primarily resided in and who depend on the forest or forests land for bonafide livelihood needs. Article 366(25) of the Constitution states that Scheduled Tribes means such tribes or tribal communities or parts or groups within such tribes or tribal communities as are defined under Article 342 to be the Scheduled Tribes.
FOREST RIGHTS 
Sec 3 of this act includes the forest rights of the forest dwelling Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers on all forest lands. In Salem Mavatta Ezhpulli Malaivazh vs The State of Tamil Nadu, In this case the court held that it would be evident that the forest dwellers, Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers have right of conversion of pattas or leases or grants issued by any local authority or any State Government on the forest lands to titles. In Kathud Ravidashbhai Dharmabhai & ors vs State of Gujarat, The court directed the respondents to expedite the process of recognition of community rights over forest resources including right to protect, conserve, regenerate forests for sustainable use and cover all villages in the same and also to expedite the process of conservation of forest settlement villages into revenue villages.
AUTHORITIES AND PROCEDURES FOR VESTING OF FOREST RIGHTS
Section 6- The Gram Sabha shall be the authority to initiate the process and to pass a resolution thereafter to forward a copy of the same to the Sub-Divisional Level Committee. Any person aggrieved by the resolution of the Gram Sabha may prefer a petition to the Sub-Divisional Level Committee within sixty days from the passing of the resolution by the Gram Sabha. The decision of the District Level Committee on the record of forest right shall be final and binding. In Arjun Ratansingh Jadhav vs State of Maharashtra, The High Court of Bombay in this case held that as per section 6, the Gram Sabha is the authority to initiate the process for determining the nature and extent of individual or community forest rights or both that may be given to forest dwelling scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers within the local limits of its jurisdiction. Petitioner has not shown document to show purchase from any such scheduled tribes as traditional forest dwellers.
OFFENCES AND PENALTIES 
Section 7- Authority or committee contravenes any provision shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees; If the offence was committed without his knowledge he should prove that the offence was committed  without his knowledge.
Section 8 - No court shall take cognizance of any offence under section 7 unless the dispute is relating to a resolution of Gram Sabha.
CONCLUSION 
It looks quite promising that Forest Rights Act shall be soon fully and completely implemented without facing its usual obstructions. The first step is already taken to access damage. Most of the problem will automatically be resolved when contradictions/overlapping of Forest Rights Act related laws will be eradicated. however, the spirit of Forest Rights Act should always be kept in mind while applying Forest Rights Act and when positive approach is taken then only Forest Rights Act will be successful in eradicating historical injustice from the lives of the forest dwellers. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A GLIMPSE ON CYBERBULLYING - BY CH.S.B.L.MEGHANA

INTRODUCTION The internet usage became a very common thing in now-a-days. As everything has its advantages and disadvantages, internet also has its advantages and disadvantages. One of the best things with usage of internet is one can use social media. Through social media one can easily share useful information, pictures, videos and opinions etc. and one should also be aware of information and opinions that they are sharing with others and here comes the concept of cyber bullying. Few examples of social media platforms where cyberbullying is so common such as Facebook, Instagram, twitter, Snapchat etc. WHAT IS CYBERBULLYING? It simply, means and refers to the misuse of technology with the intention to harm others.  Cyberbullying is  harassing, embarrassing, threatening someone or making targeting sharing about that person through technology. Cyberbullying actions, which are more common among young children and young people and it, can also be observed in adults. In ...

ETHICAL HACKING : AN OVERVIEW - BY CH.S.B.L.MEGHANA

INTRODUCTION In this era of computer, our lives always swing between cyber security and cyber threats. One should always be careful of themselves or they may be the victims of the hacking and here comes the topic of hacking. Hacking means the unauthorized person enters into a computer or into links by using some his knowledge and techniques. Where person who indulges in such action leads to loss to others and the person who indulges in such action is called hacker. As thorn should be taken by thorn and diamond cuts diamond, ethical hacking is the preventive action for hacking and person who performs it is called ethical hacker and it is called ethical hacking. Both the above hacking may resemble same but the difference lies in the intention behind such hacking. WHAT IS ETHICAL HACKING? Ethical Hacking is an authorized practice of interference into a system security to identify potential data breaches and threats in a network. The company that owns the system or network allo...

PSYCHO KILLERS : HOW ONE BECOMES? - BY K.LEELA VYSHNAVI

INTRODUCTION Crime is an act which causes harm to the individual or to the society. It’s a wrongful act which is forbidden by law. Crime is an anti-social behavior which is injurious to society. Individuals commit crime because of jealousy, greed, anger, revenge. Besides keeping criminals apart there is another kind of killers termed as  “PSYCHO KILLERS.”  Who are these? Why do they kill some other persons? What are causes for turning into psycho killer? Are there any legal consequences for that kind of killer? Psycho killers often called as serial killers. One can be called as a serial killer if he kills two or more persons in a series. Psycho killers are those who appear to be normal human beings. The style of the murder will be the same and the gap between one murder and another murder may be a day or a month or a year. The psycho killers may not even know the victim whom they are going to be killed. They behave in such a way because of many reasons which will be list...